That is why, by publishing the original copy of the FA, the NSCN wants to put Ravi on the spot to return “in an artisanal way” to the word of the center to the organization given in the presence of Modi, and then create a disagreement between the leaders of the Naga on the terms of the agreement. “Both sides have understood each other`s respective positions and are aware of the universal principle that, in a democracy, sovereignty belongs to the people. As a result, on August 3, 2015, the Indian government and the NSCN reached an agreement as an honourable solution that respects the desire of citizens to share sovereign power according to their powers. It is a great satisfaction that the dialogue between the Indian government and the NSCN has been completed and we are confident that it will enable a new lasting and comprehensive relationship of peaceful coexistence between the two entities,” says the initial framework agreement. Mr. Ravi informed the Committee that the outlines of the agreement had not been set out in the agreement. The NSCN said it had so far renounced the publication of the agreement, which respects “the tacit agreement between the two parties not to be made public for India`s security reasons.” He said that Mr. Ravi had taken an unwarranted advantage and began modifying and manipulating the agreement to mislead the Nagas and the center. For reasons better known to the government and the NSCN (I-M), the framework agreement has been kept secret for the past five years. It was only when the manipulations of the agreement were noticed that the NSCN (I-M) decided to take it out of the closet and reveal it to the world. So why did the NSCN (I-M) break its promise at the Centre? Especially at a time when the Centre`s interlocutor, R.N. Ravi, had declared that all the important agreements on the peace agreement had been reached last October and that there were only a few small unanswered questions left? The NSCN met with Ravi as interlocutor and not as governor. But since Ravi created imbroglio in the talk process, MPs give the mandate to continue the conversation with an IB team as a fast track channel for communication and clarify outstanding points in jurisdiction.
“Once everything is clear, the agreement will be at the political level of the Prime Minister,” he said. The northeastern states were cautious about the framework agreement signed by NSCN (I-M) leaders with the Indian government in August 2015. The content of the agreement has not yet been revealed, although tribal associations and civil society insist on transparency. The Naga peace talks focus on talks between the Indian government and the various actors in Nagaland to resolve decades-long conflicts. Some of these issues date back to colonial times. According to some reports, the claim of an agglomeration of Nagaland or Nagalim, which covers Nagaland, its neighbouring states and even parts of Myanmar, was an important part of Naga nationalism. This is a requirement that has been made for decades and was crystallized for the first time by the creation of a Naga Club in 1918. The Naga club had told the Simon Commission that the Nagas should be left alone “to decide for ourselves, as in the good old days.” “Where is he trying to bring the Nagas? He wants to divide the people of Naga simply by signing a parallel agreement. After manipulating the content of the AI, he informed his favorite Naga groups of how to look at the FA, that the FA is simply recognition of Naga`s past and nothing beyond.